[MTOS-dev] Background Task Change

[David Scott]

How is this different from Apache 2 / mod_perl2 with Worker MPM?

d

Byrne Reese wrote:
> Did you guys ever hear of the project I started at Six Apart called
> mod_perlite? The concept was to model a stateless apache module for process
> perl scripts based upon mod_php.
>
> In this implementation, the Perl interpreter would be loaded into Apache's
> memory space and would be spawned into threads by apache itself. No forking
> required. 
>
> The theory is that this would of course be a lot faster. Aaron Stone, an
> engineer at Six Apart, was helping me with the project (read: he did all the
> work), but we are still not finished. Is there interest in exploring this
> option further on this group?
>
> Byrne
>
>
> On 2/12/08 10:42 AM, "Reed A. Cartwright" <reed at scit.us> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hirotaka Ogawa wrote:
>>     
>>> I wonder about the feasibility of doing something after closing
>>> connection, especially for CGI.  No doubt, it'll be feasible for
>>> FastCGI.
>>>       
>> Yeah, it looks like the only way to do appendix tasks with CGI is to
>> fork.  Oh well, one more reason to go to FastCGI.
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> MTOS-dev mailing list
> MTOS-dev at sixapart.com
> http://www.sixapart.com/mailman/listinfo/mtos-dev
>
>