[MTOS-dev] Welcome to MTOS-dev

[Byrne Reese]

It might... But the only concern I have is introducing any ambiguity about
what people are installing.

Technically the product name for MTOS is "Movable Type Open Source" as the
name "Movable Type" by itself is reserved for our commercial product.

Do you think it would be weird to call it:

* movabletype-os
* movabletype-opensource

One of those would be my preference from a 6A perspective.

But do you think those names would be too redundant? I suppose though, that
if we ever built a debian package for the commercial product we could call
it:

* movabletype-pro (for the Professional Pack)
* movabletype-ent (for the Enterprise Solution)

Etc.

Thoughts?

On 12/12/07 3:26 PM, "Dominic Hargreaves" <dom at earth.li> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 12:47:22PM -0800, Byrne Reese wrote:
> 
>> Anyways, I wanted to introduce myself and welcome everyone else who feels
>> comfortable doing so and who is interested in participating in the
>> development process of MTOS to raise their hand and introduce themselves as
>> well.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've been a movabletype user for the past few years, and would now like
> to package[1] movabletype for Debian[2].
> 
> One question at this stage - what is the preferred name to distribute
> MTOS with? For the purposes of familiarity I would prefer to use
> "Movable Type" / "movabletype" - but does this conflict with the
> existence of non-OS versions?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dominic.
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=427709
> [2] http://www.debian.org/